Wednesday 18 July 2018

Diskless or Traditional Setup?

Ito po ang post ng isa nating Kapiso


Eto po ang ilan sa mga comments:


Base po sa mga comments mas marami ang gusto ay Diskless

Diskless Advantage according sa ating Kapiso:
1. No more Hdd on Clients
2. No need Antivirus/Deepfreeze (Sa server lang kailangan)
3. 10-20% electricity less
4. 1 patch/update system (Dahil server lang ang need to patch)
5. less maintenance
6. More control on your units through your server

Diskless Disadvantage:
1. Stop operation kung down ang server
2. Diskless Setup Cost (kasi kailangan ng high specs sa server lalo na kung marami kang unit)
3. Of course because server dependent ang unit lagi nakabukas ang server maski 1 or 2 lang ang tomers
4. Need Backup server just in case bigla mag down
5. Kailangan talaga dito parati my bantay (in case na magkaproblema ang server)

Traditional setup advantage:
1. Independent
2. No need ng high specs
3. Ideal para sa konting units
4. Ideal para sa mga pisonet na walang bantay (hehehehe)

Disadvantage
1. Need to patch each unit (at kung masyado malaki ang update syempre 'di kaagad makagamit ang tomers dahil sa patching)
2. Consume more electricity dahil sa may kanya-kanyang HDD
3. Maintenance

My Opinion is: Kung Marami ka units Diskless is much better pero kung konti lang naman Traditional na lang....

This blog is open for comments/suggestions for improvement... Thank You.

2 comments:

  1. sir ask ko po kung 17 units, anu po mas ok diskless or traditional? kasi sabi ng iba mas ok diskless kpg 20+ units eh ung sakin malapit na sa 20 units.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I dont believe hard drives today can consumed electricity more. It will still depend on the main specs of each cpu client (processor and mainboard), usual hdd wattage can reach 5-8 watts.

    ReplyDelete